North Korea’s military arsenal is really a hot subject today–nuclear and traditional. What is famous concerning the biological weapons (BW) program?
Researchers with Belfer Center for Science and Worldwide Matters in the Harvard Kennedy School partnered with intelligence firm AMPLYFI to look at these topics including policies and proposals for future years.
The present status and the way forward for North Korea’s BW program remain unclear however, government statements, defector testimonies, and circumstantial evidence like the smallpox vaccination of North Korean soldiers that a minimum of previously, North Korea has held a desire for developing biological weapons.
North Korea is assumed to possess several pathogens in possession to include Bacillus anthracis (Anthrax), Clostridium botulinum (Botox), Vibrio cholerae (Cholera), Bunyaviridae hantavirus (Korean Hemorrhagic Fever), Yersinia pestis (Plague), Variola (Smallpox), Salmonella typhi (Typhoid Fever), Coquillettidia fuscopennata (Yellow Fever), Shigella (Dysentery), Brucella (Brucellosis), Staphylococcus aureus (Staph), Rickettsia prowazekii (Typhus Fever), and T-2 mycotoxin (Alimentary Toxic Aleukia), the report notes.
The ROK Secretary of state for National Defense assessed that North Korea might even have abilities to weaponize them.
LISTEN: North Korea’s Bioweapon Program: Exactly what do we really know?
What’s unknown is the extent that North Korea can weaponize biological agents. The newest statement produced by the South Korean Defense Ministry is the fact that “North Korea has 13 kinds of BW agents so it can weaponize within 10 days, and anthrax and smallpox would be the likely agents it might deploy.”
It is a puzzle whether North Korea has got the capacity to weaponize all 13 kinds of agents, and whether North Korea has the ability to create a mass stockpile of stabilized biological agents.
The report also discusses the way of delivery, procurement issues and also the credibility from the sources:
Mapping out an entire picture of North Korea’s BW capacity is restricted because of difficulties in knowing the credibility of sources. In addition, views and opinions could be subconsciously biased to sensationalize tales to be able to raise awareness. Since government assessments on North Korea’s BW program rarely disclose sources or include supporting analysis, the credibility of free details are hard to verify and also the analysis hard to replicate. Defector testimonies should be thought about carefully. A lot of the data on North Korea’s BW and it is testing on human subjects arises from defectors. This source is efficacious for the reason that it offers clues for areas that require further analysis, but it ought to be noted that some defectors also provide motives to embellish or fabricate details because of money in order to demonize its northern border Korean regime.
Browse the full report HERE